The right to public service is one of the most important constitutional rights and legal rights. Therefore, the algerian legislator must protect it by stipulating in ordinary or organic laws issued by parliament. or trough regulations issued by president of republic or the prime minister. Where a single provision regulating the right public service was issued in the algerian constitutional system concerning the relationship of administration to the citizen, as stipulated in decree no. 88-131.

The Algerian legislator included scientific methods and acknowledged the importance of modern analyzes in order to resolve disputes based on establishing and determining the correct legal ratios, especially in Paragraph 02 of Article 40 of the Family Code.

Islam meant the system of inheritance, so it legislated for it a detailed and specific law that dealt with the inheritors and their shares, definitively to conflict and to ward off hatred, because if it is forbidden or blocked from it, if it is known that this ruling came from the side of the legislator, he is reassured and satisfied with God’s judgment, and this is not the case if the matter is left in the inheritance People rule in it according to their different lands and times, as this inevitably leads to confusion and discord.

???? ??? ????? ??? ????? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ??????? ??????? ????? ?????? ???????? ?? ?????? ??? 2005 ???? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ??? 06-154? ?????? ??? ????? ????? ????? ???????? ????? ?????? ???????? ???? ?????? ????? ??????? ??? ???? ?? ???? ??? ????? ?? ??? ??????? ?????? ????? ????? ??????? ??? ??? ???? ?? ???????? ????? ????? ?? ???????? ???? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ????? ???????? ??????? ????? ????????.

???? ????????? ??????? ??? ????? ???? ??????? ??? ?????? ?? ?????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ??????? ??? ?????? ???????? ??? ????? ??????? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ?? ??????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ? ??????? ??? ?? ????. ??? ?? ??? ??? ??? ??????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ???????? ?? ??? ??? ??????? ??? ?? ??????? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ???????? ????? ?????? ?? 794 ??? 807 ?? ??????? ?????? (01) ?????? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ?????? ???????.

It is natural that the joint living between the spouses requires the provision of the necessary means of living of furniture and household appliances, as the wife often contributes to the formation of the belongings of the house through the device or the Shuwar or buy some supplies, which requires when separation to take its share of household belongings, and here arises the authority of the judge In proving what is for men and what is for women, and what is common to them. In the case of a dispute between the spouses over the baggage of the house, here the judge must resort to evidence on the basis of the claim and the right to deny.

?? ?????? ?????? ???????? ??? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ??? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ?? ??? ??????? ?? ?????? ????????? ????? ?????? ??? ???????? ??? ??? ??? ?? ??? ???? ?? ??????? ???? ?? ??? ??????? ???????? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ???????? ??? ??? ??????? ??????? ???????? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ????????. ???? ??? ??????? ?????? ???????? ?? ???? ???? ?????? ???????? ???????? ?? ???? ?????? ?? ??????? ???????? ??? ???????? ????? ?? ???? ????? ?? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ?? ??????? ????? ????????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ?????? ?? ??? ??????? ???????? ???? ????? ?????? ?? ??? ???????? ???? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ?? ??????? ?????????.

The administrative and constitutional judge faces many of legal phenomena that are in the process of adapting the integrity of the legislative and regulatory texts, based on different references that some times lead to collisions for the reason of their non-hierarchicality, This means that it is not subject to the hierarchical of Kelsen, There is a difference in the adaptation between the absence of a written constitution (absence of a constitution / customary constitution) and its existence. The laws creenis one of the most important Problems raised, as well as the problems of the cas of "Untigone" and itsresults, between the hierarchy of Kelson and hierarchyinverted block of legitimacy. This paper to examine the most important of theseresults and how to deal with the constitutional and administrative judgewith the problemsraised.

The Constitution of any country reflects the political, social and economic conditions of the State and, as these conditions are subject to change according to the law of development, it must be consistent with this similar evolution of Constitutions and their modifying or distancing them from existing constitutional texts. And the constitutional order of any state cannot reach the degree of stability, however ardent, because the idea of an absolute impasse in the constitutions, impossible to achieve in practice, justifies the idea of Relative rigidity of the Constitution.

Malgré les réformes visant à concrétiser l’indépendance du conseil constitutionnel introduites en vertu de la révision constitutionnelle du 07 mars 2016, force est de constater que ni le constituant ni le législateur algérien n’ont introduit les dispositions à même de garantir cette indépendance. L’indépendance organique du conseil constitutionnel se trouve en effet malmenée par le rôle prédominant qu’exerce le président de la république dans la sélection de ses membres, et par l’insuffisance des règles visant à garantir leur indépendance et leur impartialité. Quant à son indépendance fonctionnelle elle est aussi à relativiser, Et ce parce que la constitution la soumis dans l’exercice de son pouvoir de contrôle de constitutionalité à saisine préalable d’une part, et d’autre part rien dans la législation algérienne ne permet de garantir son autonomie financière.

La question de la saisine du Conseil Constitutionnel est considérée comme l’une des axes les plus importants de la réforme, apportés par la Révision Constitutionnelle de 2016. Il a été procédé à l’élargissement des instances détenant le droit de recourir au Conseil Constitutionnel. En plus d’octroyer aux individus le droit de saisir le Conseil constitutionnel d’une manière indirecte à travers le mécanisme d’exception d’inconstitutionnalité étant soulevée par l’une des parties à l’instance engagée devant la juridiction l’examinant, compétente ou introduite devant elle. En cas de recevabilité, elle sera renvoyée devant le Conseil d’Etat ou la Cour Suprême, selon le cas, afin de la régler et d’en renvoyer celles jugées sérieuses devant le Conseil Constitutionnel afin d’y statuer en vertu d’une décision en dernier ressort.

The exchanging censorship between government and parliament has exceeded, amid the endeavor of the Algerian constitutional founder towards realizing the state of law and the traditional objectives. After having the principle of authorities separation as a concern for the state system in whole, the objective today is the democratic system which require this principle to be realized, in its new form that is not merely affecting and contributing between government and parliament but is censoring them as a foundation to have the state of law, which in turn is the pillar to balance between the two authorities. Doing so, censorship alone is not sufficient, but having its objective to maintain the highest law in the state hierarchy. The constitutional amendment of 2016 has founded for such exchanging censorship in separated texts. With regard to parliament censorship, there are mechanisms of investigation and inquiry along with discussing the work plan of government and statement of general policy. But with a flaw that government is imposing domination, for having such mechanisms very restricted and limited and never conforming to the democratic law. The government has not just provided censorship mechanisms, but after dominating the parliament proceedings, it extends to deprive the parliament from many mechanisms as arms to end it, though the parliament has some mechanisms to confront, but still deemed as frozen and threatened of end by the government. Therefore, this censorship between the government and parliament in the Algerian constitutional system has overrode the objective of protecting the constitutional text, to protecting political objectives, the fact that entails having more mechanisms supporting the parliament and minimizing the government freedom to effectively protect the constitutional text, taking into consideration the democratic building has exceeded the problem of protecting constitutional text for both authorities, to oblige them to protect it being careful enforcing its texts and embodying its principles.

The current Algerian constitution is considered a static constitution, given the difference created by the constitutional founder with regard to the procedures for amending the constitution compared to the same procedures relating to the amendment of ordinary laws.

Marriage, Conditioned Divorce, abuse of right, damage, compensation.

Contrôle constitutionnel, constitution, liberté individuelle

In order to achieve this independence, the Algerian constitutional founder devoted a set of constitutional guarantees and principles to achieve justice and equality, by protecting the judge from pressures and influences and providing the independence necessary to exercise his noble and difficult job at the same time. One of the points that limits the independence of the judiciary. However, those legal texts that came to put constitutional principles into practice were punctuated by many points that limit the independence of the judiciary.